A 3 carat emerald measures about 10.42 × 7.44 mm and covers roughly 75.0 mm² seen from above.
It reads about the size of a 3.51 ct round. Face-up it covers about 11% more area than a round of the same weight, because 3.00 ct spread into a longer outline shows more of itself from above.
| Length × width | 10.42 × 7.44 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 1.40 : 1 |
| Depth | 4.84 mm |
| Face-up area | 75.0 mm² |
| Same weight, round | 9.28 mm across, 67.6 mm² |
| Looks like a round of | 3.51 ct |
A stone's width is what crosses the finger, and the same 7.44 mm reads differently depending on whose hand it is on — which is why photographs of other people's hands mislead.
| Ring size (US) | Finger width | Stone covers |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 16.79 mm | 44% of the width |
| 6.5 | 18.10 mm | 41% of the width |
| 8 | 19.40 mm | 38% of the width |
A head is built around a seat of a particular diameter, and clearances run a tenth to half a millimetre — so a stone can be exactly the size you wanted and still not sit in the ring you picked. What each common style does with a 10.42 × 7.44 mm emerald:
| Style | Seat to order | This stone in it |
|---|---|---|
| Solitaire | 7.84 mm | Made for a stone this size |
| Halo | 7.37 mm | Will not sit — too wide for the head |
| Three stone | 7.84 mm | Made for a stone this size |
| Bezel | 7.37 mm | Will not sit — too wide for the head |
| Cathedral | 7.84 mm | Made for a stone this size |
| East–west | 10.74 mm | Made for a stone this size |
These are approximate reference values, not manufacturer specifications. Half a millimetre of error flips the answer, so use the seat diameter from the actual product page whenever you have one.
Photograph your hand, set the scale from a bank card or your ring size, and this 3 ct emerald is drawn at its real 10.42 × 7.44 mm on your own finger. The photo is processed on your device and never uploaded.
See a 3 ct emerald on your hand →