A 1.25 carat emerald measures about 7.78 × 5.56 mm and covers roughly 41.9 mm² seen from above.
It reads about the size of a 1.46 ct round. Face-up it covers about 11% more area than a round of the same weight, because 1.25 ct spread into a longer outline shows more of itself from above.
| Length × width | 7.78 × 5.56 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 1.40 : 1 |
| Depth | 3.61 mm |
| Face-up area | 41.9 mm² |
| Same weight, round | 6.93 mm across, 37.7 mm² |
| Looks like a round of | 1.46 ct |
A stone's width is what crosses the finger, and the same 5.56 mm reads differently depending on whose hand it is on — which is why photographs of other people's hands mislead.
| Ring size (US) | Finger width | Stone covers |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 16.79 mm | 33% of the width |
| 6.5 | 18.10 mm | 31% of the width |
| 8 | 19.40 mm | 29% of the width |
A head is built around a seat of a particular diameter, and clearances run a tenth to half a millimetre — so a stone can be exactly the size you wanted and still not sit in the ring you picked. What each common style does with a 7.78 × 5.56 mm emerald:
| Style | Seat to order | This stone in it |
|---|---|---|
| Solitaire | 5.96 mm | Made for a stone this size |
| Halo | 5.96 mm | Made for a stone this size |
| Three stone | 5.96 mm | Made for a stone this size |
| Bezel | 5.96 mm | Made for a stone this size |
| Cathedral | 5.96 mm | Made for a stone this size |
| East–west | 8.18 mm | Made for a stone this size |
These are approximate reference values, not manufacturer specifications. Half a millimetre of error flips the answer, so use the seat diameter from the actual product page whenever you have one.
Photograph your hand, set the scale from a bank card or your ring size, and this 1.25 ct emerald is drawn at its real 7.78 × 5.56 mm on your own finger. The photo is processed on your device and never uploaded.
See a 1.25 ct emerald on your hand →