A 2.5 carat oval measures about 10.74 × 7.67 mm and covers roughly 64.7 mm² seen from above.
It reads about the size of a 2.81 ct round. Face-up it covers about 8% more area than a round of the same weight, because 2.50 ct spread into a longer outline shows more of itself from above.
| Length × width | 10.74 × 7.67 mm |
| Length to width ratio | 1.40 : 1 |
| Depth | 4.76 mm |
| Face-up area | 64.7 mm² |
| Same weight, round | 8.73 mm across, 59.9 mm² |
| Looks like a round of | 2.81 ct |
A stone's width is what crosses the finger, and the same 7.67 mm reads differently depending on whose hand it is on — which is why photographs of other people's hands mislead.
| Ring size (US) | Finger width | Stone covers |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 16.79 mm | 46% of the width |
| 6.5 | 18.10 mm | 42% of the width |
| 8 | 19.40 mm | 40% of the width |
A head is built around a seat of a particular diameter, and clearances run a tenth to half a millimetre — so a stone can be exactly the size you wanted and still not sit in the ring you picked. What each common style does with a 10.74 × 7.67 mm oval:
| Style | Seat to order | This stone in it |
|---|---|---|
| Solitaire | 8.07 mm | Made for a stone this size |
| Halo | 7.37 mm | Will not sit — too wide for the head |
| Three stone | 8.07 mm | Made for a stone this size |
| Bezel | 7.37 mm | Will not sit — too wide for the head |
| Cathedral | 8.07 mm | Made for a stone this size |
| East–west | 10.74 mm | Only just — no room for error |
These are approximate reference values, not manufacturer specifications. Half a millimetre of error flips the answer, so use the seat diameter from the actual product page whenever you have one.
Photograph your hand, set the scale from a bank card or your ring size, and this 2.5 ct oval is drawn at its real 10.74 × 7.67 mm on your own finger. The photo is processed on your device and never uploaded.
See a 2.5 ct oval on your hand →